For the crust:
1 1/2 cups almonds
1/2 cup pecans
8 medjool dates pitted
1-2 T coconut oil
For the filling:
1 cup cashews soaked overnight and then drained
1/3 cup canned coconut milk (I used Organic Thai)
3 T sugar free maple syrup
Juice from 2 key limes (even more if you like a super tart flavor)
Directions:
Soak the cashews overnight and then drain and rinse.
In the food processor,
grind up the almonds and pecans until they are a course/crumbly
texture.
Add the dates and pulse until a dough starts to form. You may
need to add a couple tablespoons of water or oil if the dough is not
holding well.
Press the dough into individual greased tart pans.
Once all the dough is formed
in the cups, place in the fridge for 30 minutes to firm the dough back
up.
While the dough is firming back up, you can start on the filling.
Throw the cashews, coconut milk, sweetener and lime juice in a blender and blend until smooth. Pour the contents into the tart shells and let chill in the
fridge for a couple hours.
adapted from: http://mywholefoodlife.com/2013/07/03/healthy-key-lime-tarts/
Friday, November 15, 2013
Health Dangers of Eating Wheat
There has been a
lot of talk about the dangers of wheat lately. A lot of it has been
sparked by the book ‘Wheat Belly” by William Davis, M.D. It has a lot of
information that is presented in a very believable way.
(Newswire.net -- October 19, 2013) Portland, OR -- Many
experts are saying we are faced with an epidemic of gluten intolerance.
There is a whole industry of gluten free products springing up. Many
people are reading about gluten free lifestyles. Even if they aren’t
having the classic symptoms of gluten intolerance they are opting for
this change in their lifestyle.
Other experts are saying that it isn’t just the gluten we need to be aware of. One of the main health-harming culprits is found with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), a category of lectins. Regardless if the wheat is soaked, sprouted or cooked, these compounds remain intact. Tiny and hard to digest, lectins can accumulate within the body and wreak havoc on physical and mental well-being. WGA is neurotoxic, crossing the blood brain barrier and attaching to the myelin sheath, consequentially inhibiting nerve growth - a serious consideration for those suffering from degenerative neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's. These and other aspects of wheat have also been linked to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
The link between grains such as wheat and schizophrenia goes back over sixty years. During WWII grains were rationed, therefore people cut back on eating them. The documented incidence of schizophrenia dropped dramatically. Since then studies have shown that people with schizophrenia have a distinct chemical reaction when they eat grains. They just don’t digest them the same way everyone else does. In addition to schizophrenia grains have also been linked to malaise, mania, addiction, and depression, among other neurological problems. The best way to tell is to get completely off grain products and see if the symptoms improve.
Many people are now saying that grains of all types contain anti-nutrients. One of these ant nutrients is phytic acid, which combines with magnesium, iron, copper, calcium and zinc in the intestinal tract when it's left untreated. This prevents the body from being able to absorb these nutrients. Therefore, consuming large amounts of our modernly prepared whole grains can cause the body to become mineral deficient.
Another scary link to grains is autism. No one is saying that grains are THE link to autism, but they are finding that if you take grains out of the diet of the autistic their ‘symptoms’ seem to improve. Autistic children tend to have a very narrow range of foods they will eat. If breads are on that list they may hesitate to take it away, fearing their child will starve. But, if doing away with the grain products decreases the child’s autistic symptoms then in the long run they should be eating a wider variety of foods. This would in turn improve their overall health.
People with frequent headaches may also benefit from eliminating grains from their diets.
One of the more frightening diseases associated with grains is ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease. This is a disease known by the white brain matter lesions. When patients known to have this disease were put on a grain free diet the symptoms of the disease diminished or vanished completely.
These are just the problems associated with conventionally grown and organically grown grains. You mix in genetically modified grains (and they are mixing in themselves in the fields) then you add a whole new depth of health problems associated with these foods. The safest way to eat would be to avoid grains all together.
source: http://www.newswire.net/newsroom/financial/00077696-health-dangers-of-eating-wheat.html
Thursday, November 14, 2013
Dinner Fix: Stuffed Zucchini!
Ingredients:
Preheat your oven to 400 (200C).
Give the zucchini a good scrub.
Slice them in half length-ways.
Spoon out the guts. . Just take it out (leave about 1/2 an inch in) until you end up with boat like shells.
Now give the zucchini pulp a good chop, also chop a small onion and 1/2 a tomato while you’re at it.
Sautee the onions in one tbsp oil or butter. It’s ok for them to brown a little this time ’round.
When the onions are almost done, add 1/4 tsp curry powder and cook everything for an additional 30 seconds. No longer or the curry powder will turn bitter.
When they’re done, transfer them to a big bowl.
Add 1 tsp dried thyme, 1/4 to 1/2 tsp salt, 1 heaping tbsp sour cream, a good pinch of pepper, the zucchini pulp, the tomato and crumble the bacon in as well.
Lightly butter a baking dish and put the zucchini boats in.
Grab a spoon and fill the shells with the mix.
Sprinkle some aged cheese on top.
Put them in a preheated oven, give them about 20 minutes and then turn on the broiler until the top is golden brown.
Sprinkle some coarsely chopped curly leaf parsley (the most underrated herb there is) on top and you’re done.
adapted from: http://www.kayotic.nl/blog/stuffed-zucchini
- 1 tbsp sour cream
- 1/4 to 1/2 tsp salt
- 1/4 tsp curry powder
- 1/2 tomato
- 1 tsp thyme
- 2 zucchinis
- 1 onion
- cheese
- pepper
- crumbled bacon
Preheat your oven to 400 (200C).
Give the zucchini a good scrub.
Slice them in half length-ways.
Spoon out the guts. . Just take it out (leave about 1/2 an inch in) until you end up with boat like shells.
Now give the zucchini pulp a good chop, also chop a small onion and 1/2 a tomato while you’re at it.
Sautee the onions in one tbsp oil or butter. It’s ok for them to brown a little this time ’round.
When the onions are almost done, add 1/4 tsp curry powder and cook everything for an additional 30 seconds. No longer or the curry powder will turn bitter.
When they’re done, transfer them to a big bowl.
Add 1 tsp dried thyme, 1/4 to 1/2 tsp salt, 1 heaping tbsp sour cream, a good pinch of pepper, the zucchini pulp, the tomato and crumble the bacon in as well.
Lightly butter a baking dish and put the zucchini boats in.
Grab a spoon and fill the shells with the mix.
Sprinkle some aged cheese on top.
Put them in a preheated oven, give them about 20 minutes and then turn on the broiler until the top is golden brown.
Sprinkle some coarsely chopped curly leaf parsley (the most underrated herb there is) on top and you’re done.
adapted from: http://www.kayotic.nl/blog/stuffed-zucchini
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Why We're So Fat: What's Behind the Latest Obesity Rates
It used to be that rich and fat were terms associated with people,
not dessert. A portly shape, in fact, signaled the good life. If you
ever saw the musical Oliver!, you may recall the number, "Food,
Glorious Food," in which a stage full of scrawny orphans pine for the
gluttony that money can buy: "Rich gentlemen have it boys,
In-di-gestion!" Today, however, we often see the reverse scenario: the
leaner your wallet, the fatter you are.
"You have this coexistence of obesity and food insecurity in America," says Susan Blumenthal, former U.S. assistant surgeon general, clinical professor at Georgetown and Tufts University medical schools, and director of the Health and Medicine Program at the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress. Finding, and affording, healthy ood along with safe places to exercise, are among the challenges that low-income populations face.
So perhaps it's not surprising that the statistics released Monday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed that Mississippi, the poorest state in America, has the nation's highest obesity rate, at 34.9 percent. States in the South and Midwest, which, in some cases, represent the poorest parts of the country, showed the highest incidences of obesity. While financial health has a bearing on physical health, the correlation is a complicated one. Culture, gender, education, biology, and even politics, play a role. America's so-called "red" states tend to have higher rates of obesity, experts note. Plus, the prevalence of cheap, processed foods, the layout of our neighborhoods, and access to parks and public transportation also factor into one's risk for obesity and, consequently, disease. And while poor Americans may find it especially challenging to access the ingredients of a healthy lifestyle, obesity is clearly not limited to the province of the poor. More than one-third of the nation is obese, according to some data sets, and that cuts across all income levels.
"There is no single, simple answer to explain the obesity patterns" in America, says Walter Willett, who chairs the department of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health. "Part of this is due to lower incomes and education, which result in purchases of cheap foods that are high in refined starch and sugar. More deeply, this also reflects lower public investment in education, public transportation, and recreational facilities," he says. The bottom line: cheap, unhealthy foods mixed with a sedentary lifestyle has made obesity the new normal in America. And that makes it even harder to change, Willett says.
In 1990, not one U.S. state had an obesity rate greater than 14 percent, according to the CDC. Ten years later, 23 states reported an obesity rate between 20 to 24 percent. And in 2010, 36 states had an obesity rate of at least 25 percent, with 12 states reporting an obesity rate beyond 30 percent. (The CDC notes that it used a new methodology for its 2011 survey, rendering comparisons with past years rather rough.)
"We now see that life expectancy is for the first time decreasing in many parts of the South and Southeast," says Willett.
Obesity puts people at risk for heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and cancer. These illnesses, of course, exact a financial toll too. In 2008, this country spent approximately $147 billion on medical costs, the CDC says. If every American were to lose an average of 10 pounds, the United States would save roughly $29 billion a year within five years, says Jeffrey Levi, executive director of the Trust for America's Health, a nonprofit organization promoting national health. "If you really want to bend the cost curves, it isn't doing things at the margins" that counts, he says, but "taking on the fundamental challenge of preventing and reversing chronic disease."
But the CDC's state-by-state picture of America's obesity epidemic may not be the best way to understand, let alone tackle, the issue.
Obesity is tied not to states, per se, but to certain populations who reside in those states, says Barbara Ormond, senior research associate at the Health Policy Center of the Urban Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. Each of these populations grapple with specific problems, she explains. "Take, for example, comfort food, she says, which varies by culture and nutritional quality.
According to the CDC, non-Hispanic blacks have the highest rates of obesity, followed by Mexican Americans, all Hispanics, and non-Hispanic whites. When it comes to socioeconomic status, the data differ by gender. For example, college-educated women and women who earn higher incomes are less likely to be obese than women who didn't graduate high school or earn lower salaries. However, such correlations don't exist among men, for whom obesity is roughly the same across income levels. In fact, higher incomes were associated with increased obesity rates among non-Hispanic black and Mexican-American men, the CDC reports.
Such complexities explain Ormond's caveat against labeling obesity a poverty problem. It's a "shorthand way of looking at it" that reduces it almost to something that's hard to do anything about, she says. "You can't make everybody not poor, but you could give them good schools, or you could make sure the school lunch you're serving is nutritious."
Fixing this problem is going to take a proverbial village, public health experts say.
"We need to mobilize all sectors of society," Blumenthal says, calling for policies that will create more places to walk and exercise, as well as physical and health education in schools and healthier choices in vending machines, for example. But communities can begin the intervention, she says, noting the Affordable Care Act's Prevention and Public Health Fund, which can seed local efforts. Neighborhoods might come together to organize a health fair, coordinate a race to motivate community weight loss, or plant community gardens, she advises.
And beyond that, those working to fight obesity in this country ought to be patient and persistent, Ormond says. "It took us many, many years to get as fat as we are as a nation, and it's going to take us a similar number of years, or certainly a lot of effort to reverse that trend."
source: http://health.usnews.com/health-news/articles/2012/08/16/why-were-so-fat-whats-behind-the-latest-obesity-rates?page=2
"You have this coexistence of obesity and food insecurity in America," says Susan Blumenthal, former U.S. assistant surgeon general, clinical professor at Georgetown and Tufts University medical schools, and director of the Health and Medicine Program at the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress. Finding, and affording, healthy ood along with safe places to exercise, are among the challenges that low-income populations face.
So perhaps it's not surprising that the statistics released Monday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed that Mississippi, the poorest state in America, has the nation's highest obesity rate, at 34.9 percent. States in the South and Midwest, which, in some cases, represent the poorest parts of the country, showed the highest incidences of obesity. While financial health has a bearing on physical health, the correlation is a complicated one. Culture, gender, education, biology, and even politics, play a role. America's so-called "red" states tend to have higher rates of obesity, experts note. Plus, the prevalence of cheap, processed foods, the layout of our neighborhoods, and access to parks and public transportation also factor into one's risk for obesity and, consequently, disease. And while poor Americans may find it especially challenging to access the ingredients of a healthy lifestyle, obesity is clearly not limited to the province of the poor. More than one-third of the nation is obese, according to some data sets, and that cuts across all income levels.
"There is no single, simple answer to explain the obesity patterns" in America, says Walter Willett, who chairs the department of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health. "Part of this is due to lower incomes and education, which result in purchases of cheap foods that are high in refined starch and sugar. More deeply, this also reflects lower public investment in education, public transportation, and recreational facilities," he says. The bottom line: cheap, unhealthy foods mixed with a sedentary lifestyle has made obesity the new normal in America. And that makes it even harder to change, Willett says.
In 1990, not one U.S. state had an obesity rate greater than 14 percent, according to the CDC. Ten years later, 23 states reported an obesity rate between 20 to 24 percent. And in 2010, 36 states had an obesity rate of at least 25 percent, with 12 states reporting an obesity rate beyond 30 percent. (The CDC notes that it used a new methodology for its 2011 survey, rendering comparisons with past years rather rough.)
"We now see that life expectancy is for the first time decreasing in many parts of the South and Southeast," says Willett.
Obesity puts people at risk for heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and cancer. These illnesses, of course, exact a financial toll too. In 2008, this country spent approximately $147 billion on medical costs, the CDC says. If every American were to lose an average of 10 pounds, the United States would save roughly $29 billion a year within five years, says Jeffrey Levi, executive director of the Trust for America's Health, a nonprofit organization promoting national health. "If you really want to bend the cost curves, it isn't doing things at the margins" that counts, he says, but "taking on the fundamental challenge of preventing and reversing chronic disease."
But the CDC's state-by-state picture of America's obesity epidemic may not be the best way to understand, let alone tackle, the issue.
Obesity is tied not to states, per se, but to certain populations who reside in those states, says Barbara Ormond, senior research associate at the Health Policy Center of the Urban Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. Each of these populations grapple with specific problems, she explains. "Take, for example, comfort food, she says, which varies by culture and nutritional quality.
According to the CDC, non-Hispanic blacks have the highest rates of obesity, followed by Mexican Americans, all Hispanics, and non-Hispanic whites. When it comes to socioeconomic status, the data differ by gender. For example, college-educated women and women who earn higher incomes are less likely to be obese than women who didn't graduate high school or earn lower salaries. However, such correlations don't exist among men, for whom obesity is roughly the same across income levels. In fact, higher incomes were associated with increased obesity rates among non-Hispanic black and Mexican-American men, the CDC reports.
Such complexities explain Ormond's caveat against labeling obesity a poverty problem. It's a "shorthand way of looking at it" that reduces it almost to something that's hard to do anything about, she says. "You can't make everybody not poor, but you could give them good schools, or you could make sure the school lunch you're serving is nutritious."
Fixing this problem is going to take a proverbial village, public health experts say.
"We need to mobilize all sectors of society," Blumenthal says, calling for policies that will create more places to walk and exercise, as well as physical and health education in schools and healthier choices in vending machines, for example. But communities can begin the intervention, she says, noting the Affordable Care Act's Prevention and Public Health Fund, which can seed local efforts. Neighborhoods might come together to organize a health fair, coordinate a race to motivate community weight loss, or plant community gardens, she advises.
And beyond that, those working to fight obesity in this country ought to be patient and persistent, Ormond says. "It took us many, many years to get as fat as we are as a nation, and it's going to take us a similar number of years, or certainly a lot of effort to reverse that trend."
source: http://health.usnews.com/health-news/articles/2012/08/16/why-were-so-fat-whats-behind-the-latest-obesity-rates?page=2
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Snack Shift: Thai Mango Salad!
Ingredients:
- 1 yellow Thai mango
- 1 zucchini
- 1 cucumber
- 150 gr snap peas
- fresh coriander
- fresh mint
- 2 tbsp tamarind juice
- 1 lime
- 1 tsp Splenda
- salt
Directions:
Slice mango, chop snow peas, coriander
and mint.
Using a spiralizer, make zucchini noodles and cucumber
ribbons.
To make the dressing, mix tamarind juice, lime juice, Splenda and
salt.
Toss together zucchini noodles, the snow peas and the fresh herbs
and mix in the dressing.
Top with cucumber and mango slices and serve.
adapted from: http://www.veggie-wedgie.com/?p=2077
Monday, November 11, 2013
Better Beginnings: Mushroom, Green Pepper, and Feta Breakfast Casserole!
Ingredients:
- 8 oz. sliced mushrooms (I used pre-sliced white mushrooms which didn't need washing)
- 1 large green bell pepper, coarsely chopped into pieces about 3/4 inch square
- 1-2 tsp. olive oil, to saute mushrooms and green peppers
- 3 green onions, white and green parts, sliced (also called scallions)
- 1 cup crumbled feta (or more, to taste)
- 18 eggs
- 1 tsp. Spike Seasoning (optional, but highly recommended)
- fresh ground black pepper to taste
Directions:
Preheat oven to 375 F. Spray 10 X 14 glass casserole dish with non-stick spray. (A dish slightly smaller than this will work. If your dish is much larger than this, just increase ingredients slightly.
Heat non-stick frying pan, add small amount of olive oil, and saute mushrooms 4-5 minutes, until softened and partly cooked. Spread mushrooms in bottom of casserole dish. Add a bit more olive oil to frying pan if needed, and saute green peppers until softened and partly cooked. Layer peppers over mushrooms. Crumble feta cheese over top of mushroom-pepper mixture.
Beat eggs with Spike Seasoning and black pepper. (Don't add salt because Feta cheese is salty enough.) Bake about 45 minutes, or until casserole is firmly set and top is slightly browned. Serve hot. I like to eat it with a little bit of low-fat sour cream and salsa on top.
Breakfast casseroles like this reheat very well in the microwave. It can be frozen. but for best results, allow to thaw in the refrigerator before reheating. Be careful not to microwave too long; not quite three minutes is about right in my microwave.
source: http://www.kalynskitchen.com/2007/09/south-beach-friendly-breakfast.html
Sometimes You Gotta Eat Fat To Lose Fat
To lose fat, sometimes you have to eat fat. I know, I know, this
statement just "feels wrong." After all, years of anti-fat campaigning
have convinced us that fat is what makes us chunky. But did you know
that monounsaturated fats and certain polyunsaturates actually speed up
the metabolic rate?
Eric Noreen, a lipid researcher at the University of Western Ontario, believes that the best of the fat burning bunch are the highly unsaturated omega 3s called EPA and DHA. According to Eric, these omega 3 fatty acids can potentially help burn blubber through 3 different mechanisms.
1. Allowing the body to burn fat in situations where fat oxidation (or fat burning) is normally turned off. Normally, when you eat carbohydrates, fat burning is slowed or turned off. Also, during high intensity exercise, the body prefers burning carbohydrate to fat. Therefore in both scenarios, fat burning is dramatically reduced. However, cells that receive a high daily dose of omega 3s actually burn more fat in both situations. The net result — more fat burned each and every day whether you're exercising or not.
2. Increasing your sensitivity to the hormone Insulin. Insulin is both a storage hormone and an anti-breakdown hormone. When insulin goes up, a consequence of eating, ingested nutrients are stored in muscle cells and in fat cells. Likewise, nutrients already in these cells (especially the fat in our love handles) are retained as a result of this insulin boost. Since omega 3 fatty acids can make your body more sensitive to insulin, meaning that less insulin will be released each time you eat, a diet high in omega 3s helps prevent large insulin increases with eating. If insulin is properly managed, more stored fat is released each day. And guess what happens to that fat. You got it... it's incinerated.
3. Increasing the heat of your cellular furnaces. In your cells, there are two metabolic organelles responsible for burning fuel to make energy. The most well known is the mitochondrion while the lesser known one is the peroxisome. Omega 3 fatty acids have been shown to increase the size of both metabolic fires, leading to an increase in the amount of energy burned in each organelle. What this means is that a diet high in omega 3s can make you a fat burning machine.
In a series of investigations conducted by Eric and his colleagues at the University of Western Ontario, Eric showed that a diet supplemented with omega 3-rich fish oil promotes losses of body fat with simultaneous gains in lean mass. That's right, more muscle and less fat, baby.
In addition to omega 3 fatty acids, several other fats have been shown to reduce body fat. The polyunsaturated fat CLA (conjugated linoleic acid — a conjugated omega 6 fat) has shown promise, as have foods high in monounsaturated fats — like olive oil. MCTs (medium chain triglycerides) are also noteworthy. These unique fats have a shorter chain length than many of the other fats discussed in this article. As a result of their unique structure, they are more readily burned than the other types of fat, meaning more energy with less fat storage.
Of course, if you overeat on any macronutrient, you're going to store body fat not lose it. So pay careful attention to your total energy intake and, as Walter Willett suggests, try to get somewhere between 25% and 35% of your daily energy from fat.
source: http://hallfitness.blogspot.com/2012/08/sometimes-you-gotta-eat-fat-to-lose-fat.html
Eric Noreen, a lipid researcher at the University of Western Ontario, believes that the best of the fat burning bunch are the highly unsaturated omega 3s called EPA and DHA. According to Eric, these omega 3 fatty acids can potentially help burn blubber through 3 different mechanisms.
1. Allowing the body to burn fat in situations where fat oxidation (or fat burning) is normally turned off. Normally, when you eat carbohydrates, fat burning is slowed or turned off. Also, during high intensity exercise, the body prefers burning carbohydrate to fat. Therefore in both scenarios, fat burning is dramatically reduced. However, cells that receive a high daily dose of omega 3s actually burn more fat in both situations. The net result — more fat burned each and every day whether you're exercising or not.
2. Increasing your sensitivity to the hormone Insulin. Insulin is both a storage hormone and an anti-breakdown hormone. When insulin goes up, a consequence of eating, ingested nutrients are stored in muscle cells and in fat cells. Likewise, nutrients already in these cells (especially the fat in our love handles) are retained as a result of this insulin boost. Since omega 3 fatty acids can make your body more sensitive to insulin, meaning that less insulin will be released each time you eat, a diet high in omega 3s helps prevent large insulin increases with eating. If insulin is properly managed, more stored fat is released each day. And guess what happens to that fat. You got it... it's incinerated.
3. Increasing the heat of your cellular furnaces. In your cells, there are two metabolic organelles responsible for burning fuel to make energy. The most well known is the mitochondrion while the lesser known one is the peroxisome. Omega 3 fatty acids have been shown to increase the size of both metabolic fires, leading to an increase in the amount of energy burned in each organelle. What this means is that a diet high in omega 3s can make you a fat burning machine.
In a series of investigations conducted by Eric and his colleagues at the University of Western Ontario, Eric showed that a diet supplemented with omega 3-rich fish oil promotes losses of body fat with simultaneous gains in lean mass. That's right, more muscle and less fat, baby.
In addition to omega 3 fatty acids, several other fats have been shown to reduce body fat. The polyunsaturated fat CLA (conjugated linoleic acid — a conjugated omega 6 fat) has shown promise, as have foods high in monounsaturated fats — like olive oil. MCTs (medium chain triglycerides) are also noteworthy. These unique fats have a shorter chain length than many of the other fats discussed in this article. As a result of their unique structure, they are more readily burned than the other types of fat, meaning more energy with less fat storage.
Of course, if you overeat on any macronutrient, you're going to store body fat not lose it. So pay careful attention to your total energy intake and, as Walter Willett suggests, try to get somewhere between 25% and 35% of your daily energy from fat.
source: http://hallfitness.blogspot.com/2012/08/sometimes-you-gotta-eat-fat-to-lose-fat.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)